Steven Heller
The illuminated sign at the new Yankee Stadium
The seats of the
old Yankee Stadium were hard, the floors sticky, and the way-finding signs confusing, but it was the perfect place to watch baseball, drink a cold one, and munch on deep-fried savories. The
new Yankee stadium, however, like
most retro stadiums, bears the burden of being faux, a recreation, like a Disney version of reality. It works and it doesn’t.
Guest Observer
It’s every author’s dream to introduce a term into the mainstream lexicon, to condense a mountain of innovative research into a cultural catchphrase. Yet pervasiveness and longevity are also mixed blessings. Just as an idea is promoted to a slogan, it loses important nuances in its original meaning: “famous for fifteen minutes” and “form follows function” come to mind.
Robert Sommer’s
Personal Space: The Behavioral Basis of Design was published in 1969. It enjoyed an estimable twenty-five printings, and its compact title concept caught on and found its way into diverse realms, from architecture curricula to legal discourse (pertaining to sexual harassment and abortion-clinic picketing lawsuits). The notion of an invisible but perceptible security zone or spatial bubble surrounding an individual became widely understood by laypeople. The phrase “You’re invading my personal space” became a key verbal expedient for siblings of a certain generation.
How does a popular term’s derivation, and even its creator, end up forgotten by the same people who regularly and unconsciously dispense it?
Eric Baker
Here are Today’s images.
Guest Observer
The transit ticket issuing machine, patented by R. H. Helsel, 1955
Tickets: the most ephemeral of all ephemera, the rarest category of paper collectibles. Designed to be temporary stand-ins for a box at the opera or seat on the train, they were never meant to have any real permanence. After all, the conductor or person taking the tickets at the gate rips them in half. (Until recently, that is, when admission is determined by simply pointing a laser scanner at the bar code printed on an e-ticket.) Throughout history, tickets have been made of everything from ivory to semiprecious metals, to paper or card stock, to the bits and bytes of their current digital format. Even now, every journey still begins, literally or virtually, at the ticket window — an always-recognizable point of reference in unfamiliar surroundings. Tickets endure despite their temporal quality because they provide a way to orient ourselves logically and precisely on the giant invisible grid of daily life.
The dawn of the 20th Century in America marked the beginning of unbridled hope for a better future through technological advances. People shared the belief that machines would make their lives easier, better, and more fulfilling, and this was borne out by the increased amounts of leisure time and affordable travel brought about by the Machine Age. To see a play or movie, or ride the
Twentieth Century Limited, you needed a ticket, and the development of ticket-dispensing machines paralleled the growth of popular culture, allowing the entertainment and travel industries to efficiently serve greater numbers of citizens hungry for fun and adventure.
Steven Heller
In 1962, I spent hours listening to
Mad magazine’s first LP (Big Top Records),
Mad “Twists” Rock ‘N’ Roll. Playing it over and over, I learned every inane lyric by heart.
When My Pimples Turned to Dimples (That Say I Love You),
Please Betty Jane (Shave Your Legs) and the existential
(She’s Got A) Nose Job, with the refrain “now she’s the prettiest gal in town,” were imbedded in that part of my cortex that surprisingly even today is sent a twitter when I am idly waiting for take-out food or a prescription to be filled. (And if asked nicely I will gladly belt out each tune in two-part harmony.) So worn out was the vinyl of my first copy of
Twists (it was the era of the twist), I bought two additional copies, which probably sent the record straight to #102 on the Billboard Charts (without the proverbial bullet).
Michael Bierut
Warning: the following article contains spoilers for the plots of Citizen Kane (1941), Double Indemnity (1944), Stalag 17 (1953), Some Like It Hot (1959), The Longest Day (1962), and The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974). Also, it is not, strictly speaking, about design.
This was one of my father's favorite movies. He especially liked the clever way that the scriptwriters dispensed with the complicated expository material that explained the workings of the NYC Metropolitan Transit Authority's command center. As the movie begins, Matthau's character is giving a tour to a delegation of Japanese businessmen, and the tour provides the necessary background for the action that follows. The delegation reacts to the tour and to the mayhem that follows with the same smiling, cordial obliviousness, and Matthau abides this inconvenience with mounting comic exasperation, at one point calling them "monkeys" to their face. So it's a particularly funny moment near the film's end, when the leader of the group bows politely and, in perfect English, thanks Matthau for a such a fascinating tour.
I know my dad got a real kick out of this, because the first time we watched Pelham One Two Three together, at the first appearance of the Japanese tour he leaned in towards me and said, with barely disguised glee, "Walter Matthau doesn't realize they understand everything he's saying!"
Dad couldn't help it. He was a natural born spoiler.
Eric Baker
Here are Today’s images.
Alexandra Lange
Photo by Joel Sternfeld; the unrenovated High Line, April 2000, New York, NY
“The park should, as far as possible, complement the town. Openness is the one thing you cannot get in buildings. Picturesqueness you can get. Let your buildings be as picturesque as your artists can make them. This is the beauty of a town. Consequently, the beauty of a park should be the other.”
Frederick Law Olmsted, “Public Parks and the Enlargement of Towns” (1870)
In Frederick Law Olmsted’s writings about parks, one can hear the sweat of his brow. We’ve become so accustomed to the Olmsted style of park: open greenswards, thickets of trees with curving walks, rambles of greater “wildness,” that they just seem natural. But they are as constructed, and as theorized, as any building. It was his genius to make them seem easy, and thus to allow the masses to move at their ease through his additions to the urban landscape. His parks (the most famous designed with British architect Calvert Vaux) had an agenda, one which derived directly from the idea of the park as a complement to, but ever different from, the town.
The High Line in Manhattan, whose first section opened Monday, would seem to be Olmsted’s nightmare. Built atop an abandoned railroad trestle, it is long and narrow. There is no room for a lawn, the soil is too shallow for big trees, and the city presses in, sometimes closely, sometimes from afar, at every point. There is nowhere to forget where you are, who you are, where you have come from, in the way Olmsted hoped Central Park would (a thought borrowed from A. J. Downing), wiping away class distinctions with fresh air and free admission. The High Line goes against all Olmsted’s principles, and yet reveals what we take for granted in larger more pastoral parks. The extreme compression of the trestle makes the choices of landscape architects
James Corner Field Operations, the team leader, with architects
Diller Scofidio + Renfro, and planting specialist
Piet Oudolf, obvious and unavoidable. Each element, whether path, street furniture, flower bed, has to function in multiple ways to keep the landscape from getting cluttered. To put it another way, the High Line is a park as designed object — emphasis on object, since all parks are designed. The parts of the High Line, as well as the whole, are all as carefully considered as a tool that has to fit in your hand.
Michael Bierut

In a world of design consultants, information architects, and experience planners, Seymour Chwast is something refreshingly old-fashioned: a commercial artist. If this is a term that has fallen into dispute, Seymour is the best argument for reviving it. He gets up early every day, arriving in his studio by 7:30am. For the next ten or eleven hours, as far as I can tell, he doesn't seem to talk on the phone about design strategy, or plan presentations, or cold call potential clients, or negotiate fees. Instead, he just draws and paints, and paints and draws. Sometimes he has to do it because he's working on an assignment. But, as his wife of 25 years, Paula Scher, observes in her introduction to the newly published monograph
Seymour, "If there is a day that he doesn't have any drawings to make, he comes up with ideas for things that will demand he make more drawings anyway."
This prodigious output dates from 1948, when he entered the
Cooper Union, and accelerated when he founded
Push Pin Studios six years later with two fellow Cooper Students named Edward Sorel and Milton Glaser. His colleagues moved on; Seymour runs
Push Pin to this day. This kind of relentlessness requires more than dedication. There is a good reason why his book is subtitled
The Obsessive Images of Seymour Chwast. Seymour's obsessions over the past six decades have included hands, shoes, monkeys, Mexican wrestlers, and — my favorite — cars:
A site like Design Observer is filled with words, words, words. We like to talk about design, and that talk contributes to an ever expanding global conversation that continues in other blogs and in all matter of social media. But while so many of us are talking, someone has to actually keep on doing the work. Seymour Chwast is one of the best of those someones. Normally taciturn, he takes a break for a rare conversation
tomorrow night for the New York Chapter of the AIGA.
Eric Baker
Over the last several weeks, in preparation for an office move, I've been weeding out books from my over-filled shelves. We all know what a pain moving is, and so the question I asked everyday was: “Do I really need this?”
First, there were the books that I answered with “This one I
really don’t need”; then the “No, not this one either”; then came the “These are just too Goddamn heavy”; and finally, the books that had come from our publishing clients for various projects, long since past. Many of the books I have had for years: research books, odd-subject books (17th century French engravings, Persian bronzes, Ethiopian weavings, dental techniques from the '50s), photo reference books, design annuals, art books, magazines, biographies, how-to books, marketing books, fiction and non-fiction. These were books saved just because they were
books. Of course, today (when we can find any image, any fact in an instant) they feel like artifacts from a different era.
Hence, FREE BOOKS!
Other Recent Posts
Adam Harrison Levy:
Another Side of War: The Photographs of Manuel Bromberg
Guest Observer:
Jason Grant: Cultured Graphic Hygiene
The Editors:
Books Received: Summer 2009
Eric Baker:
Today, 06.06.09
Jessica Helfand:
An Open Letter to Design Students Everywhere
William Drenttel:
Once Out of Chaos
Guest Observer:
John Cantwell: Trump, The Logo
Eric Baker:
Today, 05.30.09
Guest Observer:
Ellen Lupton: A Conversation With David Barringer
Steven Heller:
How Much Is That Artifact in the Window?